(Notice: This page may contain affiliate links to Amazon, eBay, or Reeds Jewelers that earn us a commission on purchases. See our full affiliate disclosure.)

Mudmaster GWG-2000 vs. GWG-1000: Same same but different

G-Shock Mudmaster GWG-2000 Versus GWG-1000

The Mudmaster line was introduced in 2015 and quickly established itself as one of G-Shock’s top watches. This high-end “Master of G” series gained mainstream popularity in America and Europe and would become one of the most recognizable G-Shock models.

Though some people were disappointed that the recently launched GWG-2000 series did not include any new functions over the module of the GWG-1000, it does retain the same functions (Tough Solar, Multi-Band 6, Triple Sensor) and has some significant exterior upgrades. The GWG-2000 has a large metal bezel piece paired with forged carbon bumper guards and lugs. This is the first G-Shock watch to use forged carbon parts, which gives the surfaces a unique pattern, in addition to being lightweight and strong. The GWG-2000 is also a Carbon Core Guard model with a carbon fiber reinforced inner case. The stronger carbon fiber components allow the watch to have a smaller and thinner size than the GWG-1000. Despite these differences, the GWG-2000 is a good example of “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” as it doesn’t deviate from the overall style that made the GWG-1000 attractive.

Gi-Shock-Go does an excellent job examining the differences between the GWG-2000-1A1 and the GWG-1000-1A1 in the video below, with many macro shot comparisons. The GWG-2000 is the type of G-Shock watch that shouldn’t be judged on images alone, and videos like this one give a better idea of what it looks like in person. Gi-Shock-Go also published an earlier unboxing and overview video for the GWG-2000.

The combination of a stainless steel bezel and forged carbon gives the GWG-2000 a more premium look over the GWG-1000, and it manages to do this without increasing the suggested retail price (of $800) at all. This new design will also allow future models to use multicolor combinations that are not possible with the GWG-1000. The GWG-2000 is noticeably smaller and thinner than the GWG-1000, but it is still a large watch. Those with very large wrists may prefer the larger size of the GWG-1000, while it appears that the GWG-2000 is better at accommodating a wider range of wrist sizes. The LED lights on the GWG-2000 also appear to be much brighter than the GWG-1000 in the video.

The future status of the GWG-1000 is unknown, but given its popularity and the fact that its features are not obsolete, we would be surprised to see it discontinued anytime soon. Other Mudmaster lines are also still available, including the GWG-100 (Japan and Europe, with Tough Solar and Multi-Band 6), GG-1000 (battery-powered with Twin Sensor), and GG-B100 (battery-powered with Quad Sensor and Bluetooth).

Casio also released a video about the new exterior features of the GWG-2000. This video was unlisted and available at the GWG-2000-1A1 page at casio.intl.com.

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sami
Sami
2 years ago

i heard some rumors that there’s gonna be a GWG-2000 collab or special edition in January? anything you can confirm or even elaborate on?

Rodney Folsom
Rodney Folsom
2 years ago
Reply to  G-Central

Thank you!

XIS
XIS
2 years ago

Only the black GWG 1000 lacks lume on the numbers and hour markers. The other GWG-1000 models have lume just like the GWG-2000
I definitely like the look of the GWG-1000 more.

bob
bob
2 years ago
Reply to  XIS

The GWG-2000 looks better in person. The smaller dimensions are just great. Also, the materials are better.

Jory Goodman
Jory Goodman
8 months ago
Reply to  bob

That’s just your opinion, don’t act like it’s a fact.

The materials being “better”, does come at a cost of it being it being far more flashy and a lot less rugged.

Mr. Rangeman puts this entire comparison in a far better way, the GWG 1000 is a military watch, whereas the GWG 2000 is a tough watch for the city.

Both are great G Shocks, but other than preference one isn’t considerably superior over the other, because newer doesn’t always mean better.

Sudheer
Sudheer
1 year ago

Between 1000 & 2000, which is more tough and durable?

Robby
Robby
1 year ago
Reply to  Sudheer

the 1000. i fell wearing my 2000 flare red, 3 segments of the bezel scratched 300€ in damage O_o
New bezel for a 1000 series: 40€

Jory Goodman
Jory Goodman
8 months ago
Reply to  Robby

Sorry to hear that dude, and it honestly sucks that a watch being constructed of “better” materials has such ridiculous repair costs.

TrayZ
TrayZ
8 months ago
Reply to  Sudheer

I have seen you comment on YouTube as well!

How long did it take before you bought one of these Mudmaster watches?

Jory Goodman
Jory Goodman
8 months ago

GWG 1000 all the way.

The successor isn’t all that impressive, and pretty much goes against the whole idea of what a “Mudmaster” watch should be.

But I was willing to pick one up, as I actually didn’t own any Mudmasters (prior to the GWG 1000), but the way the sapphire glass on the GWG 2000 sticks out makes me paranoid.

I don’t understand why Casio would design a tough watch where the crystal has a decent chance of getting damaged upon impact, unless however they expect the newer Mudmaster to be used a lot less outdoors.

G-Central G-Shock Fan Site
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare
2